A question to the Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing, and Special Minister for State:

1. What roles will the Department of Planning and Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) have in the comparative analysis process of potential WestConnex ancillary facility options at Haberfield?
2. Who is responsible for undertaking this comparative analysis?
   1. What safeguards will be in place to ensure the integrity of the report?
3. What skills and/or expertise will the organisation tasked with undertaking the comparative analysis be required to have?
4. What is the methodology and timeline for this comparative analysis? 
5. Why was the analysis of air quality omitted? 
6. What community consultation will be required as part of this comparative analysis?
7. Will the decision arising from the comparative analysis be considered a modification to the planning approval you have already granted?
8. Why was the use of Option B sites approved if there was a requirement for further comparative analysis, and an associated mitigation and management report for approval by the Secretary of Planning?
9. Will you as the Minister for Planning have final say in determining the use of sites?

Response can be tracked on NSW Parliament's website.